Comments on: Iniquity of the Bradley amendment…

By: ray

ray — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:42:04 +0000

I have asked judges to show me a legal or statutory definition of child support in the Indiana Code so that I could determine what the “…just and appropriate award” required by the Family Support Act should be, and was told “child support is whatever the formulas say it is” and was also informed that I would be jailed for contempt of court if I continued questioning the child support guidelines by Her Honor.

So much for rebutting presumptive child support awards in IndianaNoPlace.

By: parentingadvicetips.net

parentingadvicetips.net — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:29:10 +0000

parentingadvicetips.net…

[...]Iniquity of the Bradley amendment… » Trondson Online[...]…

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment’s server IP (173.234.57.180) doesn’t match the comment’s URL host IP (68.64.128.164) and so is spam.

By: supernanny

supernanny — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 03:05:06 +0000

supernanny…

[...]Iniquity of the Bradley amendment… » Trondson Online[...]…

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment’s server IP (98.212.96.225) doesn’t match the comment’s URL host IP (184.168.187.1) and so is spam.

By: greg

greg — Sun, 05 Dec 2010 06:22:09 +0000

THE U.S. CONSTITUTION NO LONGER APPLIES TO MEN! DOMESTIC RELATION CASES, CASE LAW HAS MADE THE CONSTITUTION VOID FOR MEN!

MEN HAVE NO RIGHTS! YOUR RIGHTS ARE GONE!

YOUR MOVEMENTS, PRIVATE LIFE, MONEY, CONVERSATIONS ARE ALL SUBJECT TO THE CONTROL OF A JUDGE!

MEN ARE LEFT WITH NO INCENTIVE OR WILL TO WORK OR HAVE DREAMS! THIS ISN’T CHILD SUPPORT IT’S CALLED SLAVERY!

AMERICA IS NOT A FREE COUNTRY IT’S A COMMUNIST NIGHTMARE FOR MEN! IF YOU WANT FREEDOM AND A FUTURE YOUR GOING TO HAVE TO FIGHT FOR IT!

OUR FREEDOM IS GONE!

IT WOULD BE BETTER TO PERISH, THAN TO LIVE LIKE SLAVES! THIS ISN’T AMERICA ANYMORE!

By: Kyle Bianco

Kyle Bianco — Sat, 18 Sep 2010 17:59:00 +0000

The Bradley Amendment is fine if and only if debtor is wealthy and has the ability to pay excessive child support imposed by the family court system. However, in the case that the non-custodial parent is middle class or impoverished this amendment becomes an instrument of the government to enslave or to place the non-custodial parent in servitude. Clearly unconstitutional. Another major problem is that an agency or agencies collecting private information regarding US citizens for the purpose of financial persecution is also a clear violation of the US Constitution. The persecution is extended far beyond financial matters. The taking of passports and drivers licenses when the non custodial parent can not pay. It appears that the courts have gone far beyond their constitutional powers by making their own laws. In essence making things up as they go along. Using “preponderance of the evidence” and “a case by case basis”, excludes any rule of law to violate or even case law. The law has boiled down to junk and no law at all. Anchored to nothing except the agendas of those in power. Where the US Constitution, the framework of under which all laws are suppose to be extracted from, has and is totally ignored by law geniuses who believe they know more than the authors of the said document and the citizens of the US. Exactly what the US Constitution was written for.

By: Rev. Rocky B. Hunt

Rev. Rocky B. Hunt — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:38:09 +0000

As to the previous post. In addition thereto, I forgot to mention, that these cases are typically all being categorized as Title -IV D cases. If your ex, never received services, they would be a non-titleIV -D case which is what my case is. All of the rhetoric by these agency’s, always refers to Title IV-D because they can mislead the Justices by pre-prejudicing your positition, that you are a ‘Deadbeat Dad’ and are violating the (PRWORA) Personal Responsibility and Work Reconciliation Act of (1996). However, this may not always be the case. There is a definite distinction between the two and the rules governing same should be observed and not overlooked just to punish an obligor parent. (usually the father), and as we have seen, by the holding of the Florida Supreme Court in teh case of: AAYhash v. AYYhas, 700 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), and Ayyhash v. Farmer, 750 So2d. 691 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), the obligee, (usually the mother) and in this case was the mother was not even sentenced to community service for criminal acts she committed in an attempt to elude capture, even kidnapping the children, removing them with a visitation order in place, falsifying state and federal documents
to conceal their identities etc, etc., (all felonies). The opinion in thiscase, should be of concern to all citizen’s, that set precedent bythe Justices decision that the “mother should not be sacrificed on the alter of judicial proceesses.” The dissenting opinion by a justice in opposition thereto, stated his concerns as to what precedent is being set by Florida in allowing the mother in the case to commit felonies and get away with it.” You as citizen’s, should demand your unalienable constitutional rights, not the state’s legislativley imposed inalienable rights allowing the substitution of their bias & prejudiced opinions to fester in judgments, later impose upon you as a paying citizen who may or may not have a legal duty to pay support throught fraudulent accounting and generally accepted practices and principles (GAAP) in accounting. This state recognizes the ‘Frye’ standard, this is the accepted scientific principle, that a Judge sitting on the bench, should be held to. If he has no training in accounting, what’s he doing ruling on finincial matters in equity. Hell, I can’t balance a checkbook, let alone, use an algebraic formula to account for nor justify, a bank statement and I’d doubt that 95% of the Judge’s in Family Court who have made these determinations, can either. People it your right to demand a proper accounting / audit review of your case. Stand on that right enforce it throught Civil Contempt Enforcement Sanctions if you have to, (and you will have to). Contac the Government Accountability Office(GAO) which is the investigative arm of the Congress, as I have in numerous cases. Contact the Department of Justice (DOJ) for any type of criminal acts in violating your substantive rights, under the constitution relating to, enforcement of any administative agency, Justices or the likes, who would violate (his/her) duty to uphold them, under Article VI of the U.S. Constitution. Ask that they be held acountable for thier actions, try to get them to cut-off their funding forcing compliance to the U.S. Constitution.
I wish you all the best life has to offer, this and every day of the Holiday Season. Merry Christmas to you and yours whether politically correct, or not and continued prayer for relief to you and your.

Very Truly Yours,

Rev. R.B. Hunt
Universal Life Church of the Renaissance

By: Rev. Rocky B. Hunt

Rev. Rocky B. Hunt — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:00:57 +0000

Well they’ve done it again…
You are all needlessly suffering. What is needed is gov’t accountability. The only change in the bragley amenment needed is ‘ Properly Established ‘ which would create a position for a Judge / Certified in Accountanting, not just run of the mill, everyday Judge’s, sitting on the bench bored to death just ruling on he said she said. This would cause doubt of a Judge’s ability to adjudicate a matter involving finances, since this is all about money. He’ll I had to obtain the services on a ‘forensic accountant’ to investigate 8 cases, so far, for improper accounting practices and just recently forwarded a letter to the GAO requesting simultaneous investigations under parallel proceedings. In these cases he has uncovered fraud by establishing that the Clerk of Courts-Central Depository’s records contain, 53 week annual billing cycles, over-billing, double-billing and billings past teh emancipation events of the children. Did you know that an emancipated child becomes, sui juris and is suppose to obtain all rights associated with adulthood? What I’m stating, is that this is their cause of action, its for thei benefit according to the 5DCA hoildngs in the case of Robert S. Thurlow., P.A., v. Lafata, 915 So.2d 737 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Department of Health & Human ServicesChild upport Enforcement v. Holland, 602 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) which violates Fla. R. CIv. P. 1.210(a) ” regardless of the basis for the support duty, legal or contractual, the Child is the beneficiary and the “real party in interest” this also affects the legal standing of the Department, the Court and any Agency’s enforcment of said erroneously determined orders and the rights of the now, emancipated child to stand in thier own stead as an adult to enforce or not said ordeerr for support. The first amendment right to redress injury under the U.S. Constitution being violated, is the right to notification under the holding in the case of: Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385 (1926) which states, Notification of legal responsibility is “the forst essential of due process of law.”, that the order for support which should have been terminated upon emacipation, these enforcement agencies know, of the emancipation dates of the chil(ren) since, it is printed right
both in the final dissolution decree judgment and on the front page of the ‘supposedly’ accurate and Certified Ongoing Arrears Affidavit / Payment History. Do you know that you all arte entitled to a proper accounting / audit as a matter of law. In my case, the court has reduced itself to violating Sec’.s 409.2564(6) as well as so many others reducing fraudluent cliams to judgment and even allowed the FLa. Dept. of Rev. (FDOR) Attorney General William H. Branch, to intervene o/b/o State attorney Katherine Fernandez -Rundle who used these fraudulent affidavit’s to illegally invoke the jurisdiction of teh court in the first place. Now they’ve illeglly claimed that I am a vexatious litigant violating Sec. 69.083(2)(a), all of this is being done in contravention of the law regarding fraud in the procurement of jurisdiction, and void dissolution decree judgment. Utilizing fraud on another State by transferring the fraud through interstate processes in letters of transmittal now utilizing a fraudulent tribunal’s void order to invoke long-arm jurisdiction for collection of erroneously determined amounts. This allows the Courts to be used as a shield for fraud. Did you ever wonder why a ‘newly formed interstate support order’ cannot be overturned, modified or cancelled beyond the last request for modification? Did you ever wonder why a forum state, would get someone into a ‘Star Chamber’ proceeding, in a ‘supposed’ evidentiary setting, isolated from a public forum and reduce your ‘forensic accountant’s testimony’ to that of a layperson in order to enforce said erroneously determined and fraudulent orders? This is just some of what happend to me, by the judges of the 11th Judicial Corcuit Court in Miami-dade county , Florida. I acn’t list the violations of both Fla. and Us. Constitution’s as they are too numerous to mention. All of you should demand a proper accounting/audit of your financial position in compliance with Public Law (PL 73-10) and violates the Bradley Amendment Act of (1986) through previously or subsequently established, void & fraudulent income deductionand wage garnishment orders. These issues are now pending before the Third District Court of Appeals of Florida in CS No. 3D09- 1287 follow closley, as I attempt to overturn my void dissolution decree judgment and the fraudulent enforcment of sam by of a dozen other gov’t. entities. This mat seem insurmountable to you at times but it can be done if properly considered by a Court of justice. Unfortuneatly the only source for recompense lies in the Federal realm under 42 USC 1983, but through (Him), all things can be accomplished, it may not happen when you would like ti to, but it will happen. Keep the Spirit of Chirstmas alive in your hearts and (He) will see us through this difficult maze of rhetoric, innuendo, and unsubstantiated claims.

In HIs Service,

Rev. R. B. Hunt
Universal Life Churh of the Renaissance

By: Hugh Gladstone

Hugh Gladstone — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:52:01 +0000

One of the other reply’s questioned why the federal government does not shut down these family courts. It’s because the Federal Government started the problem in the first place. The Child Support system has become enormously expensive to tax payers, far more so than before when it was fair.. Support Collections and Support Orders have doubled in recent years while the cost to the tax payer is now more like four times the old costs. It’s because the Matching Federal Funds reward the courts for ordering more excessive, harsher and higher child support awards. It’s our TANF welfare system and it’s called Title IV-D Enforcement. This program pays out over 4.5 Billion Dollars a year in matching funds to all of the States for Ordering higher Support awards and using harsher, debtor prison collection methods. If you have ever been to family court, you might notice that everyone in there is against the non custodial parent. It’s profitable for them to be unfair to the fathers. Where does the nearly 5 Billion dollars go? Who knows, they won’;t show me where it goes. Does it go into the pockets of some of the people in the local family courts? The entire Family Court System has been engineered to make us slaves and to beat us down. We need to force a change. The Title IV-D money is supposed to be welfare, but it allows the custodial parent to get paid on it even when she has unlimited income and/or assets. My X-Wife is a millionaire and is on the IV-D welfare program while poor people who live in her county go hungry. She has gotten a free attorney for the past 4 years in addition to huge tax credits. Even though it’s welfare, the money does not go to the poor. Even Michael Jackson, if alive, would qualify for it.
It’s not a free country anymore until this is stopped.

By: Scott Howard

Scott Howard — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:03:44 +0000

Why is it that if a man and woman are together[with kids] and he loses his job and is unable to support his kids, he can go down to the local D.E.S. building and get help and he doesnt become the bad guy. But if the couple are not together and he cant support his children his face ends up on pizza boxes. It’s totally unfair, not to mention unconstitutional. I have a hard enough time in this economy trying to keep a roof over my head without worrying about my drivers license being suspended, or going to jail for simply being broke.

By: Precious Aso

Precious Aso — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:53:11 +0000

I think the government has been raising revenue for itself and caring less about the charge and in the process punishing citizens who are doing right by their children. This is a typical example of overzealous law makers who make judgments from their axis of the world without looking at the full picture.

In Florida fathers are being asked to pay child support for children that DNA has proven are not theirs, while the state makes no provision for a DNA test before the father signs the birth certificate, but they fault the father for signing the birth certificate after his live in girlfriend who he has no knowledge has been cheating on him told him he is the father of the child.

I would like to fight the system and anyone who is interested in fighting this fight with me should please contact me via my email.